CONTRIBUTING: rename doc per Google OSS policies
Google OSS policies say to name this "CONTRIBUTING.md". Change-Id: I037f52a443caacc89868b7c14af91dd3d1b681a9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/499761 Reviewed-by: Gavin Mak <gavinmak@google.com> Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com> Commit-Queue: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
38d2fe11b9
commit
58a59fdfbc
3 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
190
CONTRIBUTING.md
Normal file
190
CONTRIBUTING.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
|
|||
# Submitting Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Here's a short overview of the process.
|
||||
|
||||
* Make small logical changes.
|
||||
* [Provide a meaningful commit message][commit-message-style].
|
||||
* Make sure all code is under the Apache License, 2.0.
|
||||
* Publish your changes for review.
|
||||
* `git push origin HEAD:refs/for/main`
|
||||
* Make corrections if requested.
|
||||
* [Verify your changes on Gerrit.](#verify)
|
||||
* [Send to the commit queue for testing & merging.](#cq)
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
## Long Version
|
||||
|
||||
I wanted a file describing how to submit patches for repo,
|
||||
so I started with the one found in the core Git distribution
|
||||
(Documentation/SubmittingPatches), which itself was based on the
|
||||
patch submission guidelines for the Linux kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
However there are some differences, so please review and familiarize
|
||||
yourself with the following relevant bits.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Make separate commits for logically separate changes.
|
||||
|
||||
Unless your patch is really trivial, you should not be sending out a patch that
|
||||
was generated between your working tree and your commit head.
|
||||
Instead, always make a commit with a complete
|
||||
[commit message][commit-message-style] and generate a series of patches from
|
||||
your repository.
|
||||
It is a good discipline.
|
||||
|
||||
Describe the technical detail of the change(s).
|
||||
|
||||
If your description starts to get too long, that's a sign that you
|
||||
probably need to split up your commit to finer grained pieces.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Linting and formatting code
|
||||
|
||||
Lint any changes by running:
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
$ tox -e lint -- file.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
And format with:
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
$ tox -e format -- file.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or format everything:
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
$ tox -e format
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Repo uses [black](https://black.readthedocs.io/) with line length of 80 as its
|
||||
formatter and flake8 as its linter. Repo also follows
|
||||
[Google's Python Style Guide].
|
||||
|
||||
There should be no new errors or warnings introduced.
|
||||
|
||||
Warnings that cannot be avoided without going against the Google Style Guide
|
||||
may be suppressed inline individally using a `# noqa` comment as described
|
||||
in the [flake8 documentation].
|
||||
|
||||
If there are many occurrences of the same warning, these may be suppressed for
|
||||
the entire project in the included `.flake8` file.
|
||||
|
||||
[Google's Python Style Guide]: https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html
|
||||
[PEP 8]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
|
||||
[flake8 documentation]: https://flake8.pycqa.org/en/3.1.1/user/ignoring-errors.html#in-line-ignoring-errors
|
||||
|
||||
## Running tests
|
||||
|
||||
We use [pytest](https://pytest.org/) and [tox](https://tox.readthedocs.io/) for
|
||||
running tests. You should make sure to install those first.
|
||||
|
||||
To run the full suite against all supported Python versions, simply execute:
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
$ tox -p auto
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We have [`./run_tests`](./run_tests) which is a simple wrapper around `pytest`:
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
# Run the full suite against the default Python version.
|
||||
$ ./run_tests
|
||||
# List each test as it runs.
|
||||
$ ./run_tests -v
|
||||
|
||||
# Run a specific unittest module (and all tests in it).
|
||||
$ ./run_tests tests/test_git_command.py
|
||||
|
||||
# Run a specific testsuite in a specific unittest module.
|
||||
$ ./run_tests tests/test_editor.py::EditString
|
||||
|
||||
# Run a single test.
|
||||
$ ./run_tests tests/test_editor.py::EditString::test_cat_editor
|
||||
|
||||
# List all available tests.
|
||||
$ ./run_tests --collect-only
|
||||
|
||||
# Run a single test using substring match.
|
||||
$ ./run_tests -k test_cat_editor
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The coverage isn't great currently, but it should still be run for all commits.
|
||||
Adding more unittests for changes you make would be greatly appreciated :).
|
||||
Check out the [tests/](./tests/) subdirectory for more details.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Check the license
|
||||
|
||||
repo is licensed under the Apache License, 2.0.
|
||||
|
||||
Because of this licensing model *every* file within the project
|
||||
*must* list the license that covers it in the header of the file.
|
||||
Any new contributions to an existing file *must* be submitted under
|
||||
the current license of that file. Any new files *must* clearly
|
||||
indicate which license they are provided under in the file header.
|
||||
|
||||
Please verify that you are legally allowed and willing to submit your
|
||||
changes under the license covering each file *prior* to submitting
|
||||
your patch. It is virtually impossible to remove a patch once it
|
||||
has been applied and pushed out.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Sending your patches.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not email your patches to anyone.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, login to the Gerrit Code Review tool at:
|
||||
|
||||
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure you have completed one of the necessary contributor
|
||||
agreements, providing documentation to the project maintainers that
|
||||
they have right to redistribute your work under the Apache License:
|
||||
|
||||
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/settings/agreements
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure you have obtained an HTTP password to authenticate:
|
||||
|
||||
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/new-password
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure that you have the local commit hook installed to automatically
|
||||
add a ChangeId to your commits:
|
||||
|
||||
curl -Lo `git rev-parse --git-dir`/hooks/commit-msg https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/tools/hooks/commit-msg
|
||||
chmod +x `git rev-parse --git-dir`/hooks/commit-msg
|
||||
|
||||
If you have already committed your changes you will need to amend the commit
|
||||
to get the ChangeId added.
|
||||
|
||||
git commit --amend
|
||||
|
||||
Push your patches over HTTPS to the review server, possibly through
|
||||
a remembered remote to make this easier in the future:
|
||||
|
||||
git config remote.review.url https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/git-repo
|
||||
git config remote.review.push HEAD:refs/for/main
|
||||
|
||||
git push review
|
||||
|
||||
You will be automatically emailed a copy of your commits, and any
|
||||
comments made by the project maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Make changes if requested
|
||||
|
||||
The project maintainer who reviews your changes might request changes to your
|
||||
commit. If you make the requested changes you will need to amend your commit
|
||||
and push it to the review server again.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Verify your changes on Gerrit {#verify}
|
||||
|
||||
After you receive a Code-Review+2 from the maintainer, select the Verified
|
||||
button on the Gerrit page for the change. This verifies that you have tested
|
||||
your changes and notifies the maintainer that they are ready to be submitted.
|
||||
|
||||
## Merge your changes via the commit queue {#cq}
|
||||
|
||||
Once a change is ready to be merged, select the Commit-Queue+2 setting on the
|
||||
Gerrit page for it. This tells the CI system to test the change, and if it
|
||||
passes all the checks, automatically merges it.
|
||||
|
||||
[commit-message-style]: https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue