1
0
Fork 0

Update patch set 3

Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 3
Reviewer: Gerrit User 1088583 <1088583@173816e5-2b9a-37c3-8a2e-48639d4f1153>
Reviewer: Gerrit User 1007145 <1007145@173816e5-2b9a-37c3-8a2e-48639d4f1153>
Label: Code-Review=+2, 9ecb45c1e74ff5813582282655ead4e056d633ab
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1007145 \u003c1007145@173816e5-2b9a-37c3-8a2e-48639d4f1153\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1007145\u003e replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1088583 \u003c1088583@173816e5-2b9a-37c3-8a2e-48639d4f1153\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1007145\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 1007145 2025-04-17 00:14:25 -07:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent f7eb7f9819
commit 4378af67bd

View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
{
"comments": [
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "ee3b6ccd_39f60f6c",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 3
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 1007145
},
"writtenOn": "2025-04-17T07:14:25Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "would be nice if git exited with a more specific status code vs plain `1` (which could be other things). i don\u0027t think we want to try to sniff the output either. i guess worst case scenario is we try to fetch twice in an error case, but error case isn\u0027t the norm, so eh.",
"revId": "ca8d36f4d0e2c07b95b18a8f0b1817fb7c14d9b2",
"serverId": "173816e5-2b9a-37c3-8a2e-48639d4f1153"
}
]
}